Triple

T31605788
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Röstigraben E806478 entity
Predicate hasOppositeView P184392 FINISHED
Object idea of Swiss national cohesion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: idea of Swiss national cohesion | Statement: [Röstigraben, hasOppositeView, idea of Swiss national cohesion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOppositeView
Context triple: [Röstigraben, hasOppositeView, idea of Swiss national cohesion]
  • A. hasOppositeComponent
    Indicates that one component is related to another as its opposite or contrasting counterpart within a system or structure.
  • B. hasOppositeStructure
    Indicates that one entity possesses a structure that is the inverse or opposite in form, arrangement, or organization relative to another entity.
  • C. hasOppositeStatus
    Indicates that two entities hold directly contrasting or mutually exclusive statuses within a given context.
  • D. hasOppositeDirectionTo
    Indicates that one entity’s direction is exactly reversed or opposed to the direction of another entity.
  • E. hasOppositeTime
    Indicates a temporal relationship where one time point or period is positioned as the direct opposite or inverse of another within a defined temporal framework (e.g., day vs. night, past vs. future).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d54ccc8190a03b5df9a2b40b25 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b0e5744c8190a22c1e1d6fcfa466 completed May 3, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7ab70d034819080295628497d8582 completed May 3, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7b0e3917481908a394680d76743c3 completed May 3, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:34 p.m.