Triple
T31605668
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Swiss law |
E806476
|
entity |
| Predicate | mainAdministrativeCourtStatute |
P152617
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Federal Supreme Court Act |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Supreme Court Act | Statement: [Swiss law, mainAdministrativeCourtStatute, Federal Supreme Court Act]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainAdministrativeCourtStatute Context triple: [Swiss law, mainAdministrativeCourtStatute, Federal Supreme Court Act]
-
A.
coreAdministrativeProcedureStatute
chosen
Indicates the statute that serves as the primary legal basis governing the administrative procedures applicable to the referenced action or entity.
-
B.
appliesAdministrativeLaw
Indicates that an authority or process enforces or interprets administrative law in relation to a particular case, entity, or situation.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
legalSystemBasis
Indicates the foundational legal framework, tradition, or set of principles on which a legal system is based.
-
E.
statutePage
Indicates a relationship where a specific page number is associated with a statute within a legal or legislative document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d54ccc8190a03b5df9a2b40b25 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6db6af1d88190989810182354d60f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d82d068c8190940a3200ed760e38 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:34 p.m.