Triple
T31605660
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Swiss law |
E806476
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresForConstitutionalAmendment |
P117670
|
FINISHED |
| Object | double majority of people and cantons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: double majority of people and cantons | Statement: [Swiss law, requiresForConstitutionalAmendment, double majority of people and cantons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresForConstitutionalAmendment Context triple: [Swiss law, requiresForConstitutionalAmendment, double majority of people and cantons]
-
A.
requiresForOverallAmendment
chosen
Indicates that one action, condition, or component must be fulfilled or present in order for an overall amendment to be valid or completed.
-
B.
amendmentRequires
Indicates that a particular amendment is necessary or must be applied in relation to another item, document, or condition.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
-
E.
constitutionalAmendmentInvolved
Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d54ccc8190a03b5df9a2b40b25 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe9dfaa2d08190b2084f63f842eb6b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe9bba947c81908b0b2b92a4d19b37 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:34 p.m.