Triple

T31601842
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject It's Fun to Be Free E806366 entity
Predicate hasMultipleArrangements P192501 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [It's Fun to Be Free, hasMultipleArrangements, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMultipleArrangements
Context triple: [It's Fun to Be Free, hasMultipleArrangements, true]
  • A. hasAlternativeArrangement
    Indicates that one entity can be organized, configured, or structured in a different valid way as an alternative to its current or primary arrangement.
  • B. hasArrangement
    Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
  • C. hasMultipleMelodies
    Indicates that an entity is associated with more than one distinct melody.
  • D. hasArrangementFor
    Indicates that one entity has an established plan, setup, or provision in place to accommodate, support, or serve another entity or purpose.
  • E. hasLiveArrangement
    Indicates that there is an active, ongoing arrangement or agreement currently in effect between the related entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d54ccc8190a03b5df9a2b40b25 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd0d0ba5c48190bddb3f0e6637544c completed May 7, 2026, 10:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd0c4324a8819086c90adf46216e0e completed May 7, 2026, 10:03 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd0d0aebac8190868a7714ddb4f1fd completed May 7, 2026, 10:07 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:33 p.m.