Triple

T31594256
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mäṣḥafä Fəkkare Iyäsus E806179 entity
Predicate statusWithinCommunity P38813 FINISHED
Object central text LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: central text | Statement: [Mäṣḥafä Fəkkare Iyäsus, statusWithinCommunity, central text]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusWithinCommunity
Context triple: [Mäṣḥafä Fəkkare Iyäsus, statusWithinCommunity, central text]
  • A. statusInCommunity chosen
    Indicates the social standing, role, or level of acceptance an entity holds within a particular community.
  • B. statusOfCommunity
    Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of a community at a given point in time.
  • C. hasRoleInCommunity
    Indicates that an entity holds or performs a specific role, function, or position within a particular community.
  • D. isCommunityBy
    Indicates that something functions as or is recognized as a community defined or established by a particular agent or source.
  • E. isCommunity
    Indicates that an entity functions as or is classified as a community, typically representing a group of individuals connected by shared location, interests, or characteristics.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d4891c8190b02bae3c8ecb68b7 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe6739d4dc8190ae7505c089bbac29 completed May 8, 2026, 10:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe6541dffc81909c66a61ba69f38fc completed May 8, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:29 p.m.