Triple
T3158449
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jean Hagen as Lina Lamont |
E66045
|
entity |
| Predicate | metaCommentaryOn |
P46691
|
FINISHED |
| Object | starImageVsReality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: starImageVsReality | Statement: [Jean Hagen as Lina Lamont, metaCommentaryOn, starImageVsReality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: metaCommentaryOn Context triple: [Jean Hagen as Lina Lamont, metaCommentaryOn, starImageVsReality]
-
A.
commentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides evaluative or explanatory remarks about another entity, such as a work, event, or statement.
-
B.
hasCommentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides commentary, explanation, or evaluative remarks about another entity.
-
C.
commentedOnBy
Indicates that an entity has received a comment authored or posted by another entity.
-
D.
notableOpinion
Indicates that one entity holds a significant or widely recognized opinion or viewpoint about another entity.
-
E.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85850c1481908a9e9c6242238de2 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada5ed82a08190a1bdcf18ee593c79 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9dfbf0348190952a6bca8fc5fed1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada1e4f7288190a80a1672e458132d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:05 p.m.