Triple
T31582853
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Windows NT security model |
E805871
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesAccessControlEntry |
P180166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ACE |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ACE | Statement: [Windows NT security model, usesAccessControlEntry, ACE]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesAccessControlEntry Context triple: [Windows NT security model, usesAccessControlEntry, ACE]
-
A.
controlsAccessTo
Indicates that one entity regulates, manages, or determines the ability of another entity to reach, use, or interact with a resource, location, or service.
-
B.
hasAccessTo
Indicates that one entity is permitted to enter, use, or interact with another entity, resource, or location.
-
C.
hasAccessBy
Indicates that one entity is permitted to access, use, or interact with another entity, typically under specified permissions or conditions.
-
D.
hasAccessTowards
Indicates that one entity possesses the ability, permission, or means to reach, use, or interact with another entity or resource.
-
E.
canAccedeBy
Indicates that one entity is able to obtain or assume a position, status, or right by means of another specified entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d3a86c8190a3e5e539a4dd125f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73223675481908c1bc3208c0f5284 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7317690108190b3aae2cd2e1d069e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f73221eef88190bd8905e6e9f5a586 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:24 p.m.