Triple

T31567645
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kim Brown E805461 entity
Predicate hasPersonalRelationshipWith P61561 FINISHED
Object Tiffy Gerhardt NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tiffy Gerhardt | Statement: [Kim Brown, hasPersonalRelationshipWith, Tiffy Gerhardt]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPersonalRelationshipWith
Context triple: [Kim Brown, hasPersonalRelationshipWith, Tiffy Gerhardt]
  • A. influencedByPersonalRelationshipWith
    Indicates that one entity’s decisions, opinions, or actions are shaped or affected by a personal relationship it has with another entity.
  • B. haveRelationshipWith
    Indicates that one entity is in some form of defined relationship or association with another entity.
  • C. inRelationshipWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • D. worksInCloseRelationshipWith
    Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
  • E. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d2ee94819091918d1789398c29 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd35d108908190b79b1e8e6bbd62aa completed May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd34cb46108190b43c3b7f67ec4cd4 completed May 8, 2026, 12:56 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:18 p.m.