Triple
T31557352
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rapid Security Response |
E805163
|
entity |
| Predicate | userVisibility |
P74023
|
FINISHED |
| Object | shown as separate item in Software Update |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shown as separate item in Software Update | Statement: [Rapid Security Response, userVisibility, shown as separate item in Software Update]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: userVisibility Context triple: [Rapid Security Response, userVisibility, shown as separate item in Software Update]
-
A.
visibilityStatus
chosen
Indicates the current level or state of how observable, accessible, or exposed an entity is within a given context.
-
B.
visibleAt
Indicates that one entity can be seen or perceived from a specific location, viewpoint, or context at a given time.
-
C.
visibilityControlledBy
Indicates that the visibility or hidden/shown state of one entity is determined or governed by another entity.
-
D.
isVisibleAs
Indicates that one entity can be perceived or appears to observers under the form, name, or representation of another entity.
-
E.
hasVisibility
Indicates that one entity can perceive, view, or access another entity or its information under certain conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d22e088190ad555d5bd42f9da0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a8055f8081908f635fe04654b5fe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6a75656e081908739ed9e2f600e42 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:13 p.m.