Triple
T31546191
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | the Mechanism |
E804877
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTypeOfCrimeJurisdiction |
P194097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | genocide |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genocide | Statement: [the Mechanism, hasTypeOfCrimeJurisdiction, genocide]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfCrimeJurisdiction Context triple: [the Mechanism, hasTypeOfCrimeJurisdiction, genocide]
-
A.
hasCriminalJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or legal body holds the power to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate criminal offenses committed within a specified scope or territory in relation to another entity.
-
B.
criminalJurisdictionIncludes
Indicates that a particular legal authority’s criminal jurisdiction extends to and covers the specified area, person, or matter.
-
C.
hadJurisdictionType
Indicates that a governing body, authority, or legal entity possessed a specific type or scope of jurisdiction over a matter, area, or population.
-
D.
hasClassifiedCrime
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been assigned or associated with a specific crime category or classification.
-
E.
jurisdictionOfProsecution
Indicates the legal authority or territory within which a prosecution is carried out or has the power to proceed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d11a048190a65eb8384a3754ac |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe91383a1c81909266e40c3c3ede6c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe8fde094081908f0f121664fbb5c7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:08 p.m.