Triple
T31531672
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Find My Way |
E804494
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemixAlbumAppearance |
P203381
|
FINISHED |
| Object | McCartney III Imagined |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: McCartney III Imagined | Statement: [Find My Way, hasRemixAlbumAppearance, McCartney III Imagined]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemixAlbumAppearance Context triple: [Find My Way, hasRemixAlbumAppearance, McCartney III Imagined]
-
A.
hasRemixOrCovers
Indicates that one creative work is a remix or cover version of another work.
-
B.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
C.
hasRemixed
Indicates that one entity has created a new version or adaptation of another entity by remixing it.
-
D.
hasRemixArtistType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or role of artist responsible for creating a remix version of a work.
-
E.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d03ef88190a2b73d7b94b9e02d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a017114e7148190b7479284c316443d |
completed | May 11, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a016eebd60481909212e2a49ef95fbe |
completed | May 11, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a0171143bd081909b68cca366b4dfb0 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:01 p.m.