Triple
T31510067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mi'kmaq–British treaties |
E803917
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Indigenous–Crown treaties in Canada |
C60391
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Indigenous–Crown treaties in Canada Context triple: [Mi'kmaq–British treaties, instanceOf, Indigenous–Crown treaties in Canada]
-
A.
Indian Act
The Indian Act is a Canadian federal law that governs the status, rights, and administration of First Nations peoples and communities, historically enabling extensive government control and assimilation policies.
-
B.
modern treaty government
A modern treaty government is a self-governing Indigenous political entity established through contemporary land claim and self-government agreements, exercising defined jurisdiction and authority recognized in Canadian constitutional and legal frameworks.
-
C.
Indigenous diplomatic practice
Indigenous diplomatic practice encompasses the traditional and evolving ways Indigenous peoples build, maintain, and restore relationships and agreements with other Indigenous nations, states, and non-Indigenous entities, grounded in their own laws, protocols, and worldviews.
-
D.
Aboriginal rights case
An Aboriginal rights case is a legal proceeding that addresses claims by Indigenous peoples to inherent or treaty-based rights, such as land, resources, self-governance, or cultural practices, and determines how those rights are recognized and protected under state law.
-
E.
Indigenous self-government
Indigenous self-government is the inherent right and practical authority of Indigenous peoples to govern their own affairs, lands, and communities according to their laws, traditions, and institutions, within or alongside existing state structures.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ceb0a48190ae7feca263b6296c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:49 p.m.