Triple
T31498497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Apple Design Awards 2021 |
E803611
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWinnerInCategory Innovation |
P178082
|
FINISHED |
| Object | NaadSadhana |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NaadSadhana | Statement: [Apple Design Awards 2021, hasWinnerInCategory Innovation, NaadSadhana]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWinnerInCategory Innovation Context triple: [Apple Design Awards 2021, hasWinnerInCategory Innovation, NaadSadhana]
-
A.
hasInnovationType
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of innovation.
-
B.
hasInnovationStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a particular classification or state regarding its level, type, or stage of innovation.
-
C.
hasGenreInnovation
Indicates that something introduces a novel or pioneering approach within its genre or category.
-
D.
generalClassificationWinner
Indicates that the subject is the overall winner in the general classification or overall standings of a competition or event.
-
E.
innovationLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which something is new, original, or creatively advanced compared to existing norms or solutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348cae52081909fa8e5f697523ae3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f707f7959881908f037f0d6b1d0c36 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f700fc274c8190a128593dc7c7abd0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f707f380388190954b79d52a321921 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:42 p.m.