Triple
T31498109
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S-Cinetone |
E803603
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorScience |
P62473
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sony Venice-derived color science |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sony Venice-derived color science | Statement: [S-Cinetone, colorScience, Sony Venice-derived color science]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorScience Context triple: [S-Cinetone, colorScience, Sony Venice-derived color science]
-
A.
colorTheory
Indicates a relationship where principles or concepts about how colors interact, combine, or affect perception are applied or referenced between entities.
-
B.
colors
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
C.
colorUse
Indicates that one entity uses, applies, or is associated with a particular color in its appearance, design, or representation.
-
D.
colorSystem
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a system or scheme used to define, organize, or represent the colors of another entity.
-
E.
color work
Indicates that an entity applies or adds color to another entity, typically as part of a creative or finishing process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348cae52081909fa8e5f697523ae3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7465687bc8190a9da44d62b634ed7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f743f4ceb08190a21fe7f4a99b166b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:42 p.m.