Triple
T31490706
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ulpia Severina |
E803395
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalEvidenceType |
P185934
|
FINISHED |
| Object | numismatic evidence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: numismatic evidence | Statement: [Ulpia Severina, historicalEvidenceType, numismatic evidence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalEvidenceType Context triple: [Ulpia Severina, historicalEvidenceType, numismatic evidence]
-
A.
historicalEvidence
Indicates that there exists documented or otherwise verifiable information supporting the occurrence, authenticity, or truth of a past event, state, or relationship between entities.
-
B.
hasHistoricalEvidenceType
chosen
Indicates that there exists a specific kind or category of historical evidence supporting or documenting the related entity or event.
-
C.
historicalType
Indicates that one entity classifies or characterizes another in terms of its role, status, or category within a historical context.
-
D.
historicalMaterial
Indicates that something serves as a source or document providing information or evidence about past events or conditions.
-
E.
monumentalEvidence
Indicates that something serves as large-scale, highly significant evidence supporting or demonstrating another entity, event, or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ca04508190ba9379b5329dfd75 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff45793d5c81909dc503ad1f714ee2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff41cb0e088190a6e9b03cb20e5fad |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:38 p.m.