Triple
T31490508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WWV 86A |
E803391
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasKeyMotifs |
P41002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rheingold motif |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rheingold motif | Statement: [WWV 86A, hasKeyMotifs, Rheingold motif]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyMotifs Context triple: [WWV 86A, hasKeyMotifs, Rheingold motif]
-
A.
usesMotifsFrom
Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
-
B.
featuresMotif
chosen
Indicates that something contains, incorporates, or prominently includes a particular recurring motif or pattern.
-
C.
hasMirrorMotif
Indicates that one entity features a mirror-related motif or pattern in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
hasClosingMotif
Indicates that one entity features or is associated with a recurring thematic or structural pattern used at the end or conclusion of another entity.
-
E.
hasMotivicFunction
Indicates that one musical element serves a specific thematic or structural role in relation to a larger motive or passage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ca04508190ba9379b5329dfd75 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7764ab1fc81909f9348db87bd7692 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f76905d9c88190b1ee810bc9ab644f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:38 p.m.