Triple
T31481411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bushmills Causeway Collection |
E803153
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesExpressionType |
P203193
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single malt |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single malt | Statement: [Bushmills Causeway Collection, includesExpressionType, single malt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesExpressionType Context triple: [Bushmills Causeway Collection, includesExpressionType, single malt]
-
A.
supportsExpressionType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, processing, or being compatible with a specified type of expression.
-
B.
hasExpressionIn
Indicates that one entity is manifested, represented, or realized within another entity, typically as a specific form, version, or expression.
-
C.
hasExpression
Indicates that an entity displays or possesses a particular facial or emotional expression.
-
D.
usesExpression
Indicates that one entity employs or applies a particular expression (such as a phrase, symbol, or formula) in its communication or representation.
-
E.
includesClause
Indicates that one entity (typically a document, contract, or statement) contains or incorporates a specific clause as part of its content.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348c9477c8190bc0a21f6d482d2fc |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a01378bf05c8190af9f5e06a2810c7d |
completed | May 11, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0137277c6c8190bcec341f2a0757c4 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a01378b165c8190b7b738da4e1ab36b |
completed | May 11, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:32 p.m.