Triple
T31474739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CM |
E802959
|
entity |
| Predicate | identifiesAdministrativeArea |
P62401
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Comrat municipality |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Comrat municipality | Statement: [CM, identifiesAdministrativeArea, Comrat municipality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: identifiesAdministrativeArea Context triple: [CM, identifiesAdministrativeArea, Comrat municipality]
-
A.
denotesAdministrativeArea
chosen
Indicates that one entity designates or specifies another entity as its relevant administrative area or jurisdiction.
-
B.
hasAdministrativeArea
Indicates that one entity serves as the governing or jurisdictional area responsible for administering another entity.
-
C.
administrativeDistrictOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the administrative district or jurisdictional area governing or encompassing another entity.
-
D.
administrativeTerritorialEntityOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the administrative territorial unit or jurisdiction to which another entity belongs or is governed by.
-
E.
isAdministrativeDivision
Indicates that one entity functions as an official administrative subdivision or jurisdiction within the governance structure of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348c9477c8190bc0a21f6d482d2fc |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c8159edc8190b1c87015e0c820e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f42fbc8190a06eb1044c9e6094 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:28 p.m.