Triple
T31472073
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DDG |
E802885
|
entity |
| Predicate | indicatesCapability |
P116691
|
FINISHED |
| Object | anti-air warfare |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anti-air warfare | Statement: [DDG, indicatesCapability, anti-air warfare]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: indicatesCapability Context triple: [DDG, indicatesCapability, anti-air warfare]
-
A.
definesCapability
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the abilities, functions, or capacities that another entity can possess or perform.
-
B.
demonstratedCapability
Indicates that an entity has shown, through evidence or performance, the ability to carry out a specific action or function.
-
C.
reflectsCapability
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses, represents, or demonstrates the ability, capacity, or potential of another entity.
-
D.
providesCapabilityTo
Indicates that one entity enables or equips another entity with a specific capability or functionality.
-
E.
isPartOfCapability
Indicates that one capability is a component or sub-function within a broader, composite capability.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348c84c1c81908739f100ecf7394e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a5f71b2c8190aade8a83f465be0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69fe66df08190958558d63ee623d9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:26 p.m.