Triple

T31463971
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mexican Sign Language E802674 entity
Predicate isNotManuallyCodedFormOf P171908 FINISHED
Object Spanish NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish | Statement: [Mexican Sign Language, isNotManuallyCodedFormOf, Spanish]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNotManuallyCodedFormOf
Context triple: [Mexican Sign Language, isNotManuallyCodedFormOf, Spanish]
  • A. isCodifiedFormOf
    Indicates that one entity is the formal, standardized, or officially documented version or expression of another entity.
  • B. isNotIndicatedFor
    Indicates that a treatment, action, or option is not recommended or appropriate for a particular condition, situation, or entity.
  • C. hasNonStandardForm
    Indicates that an entity possesses a form, variant, or representation that deviates from the standard, canonical, or commonly accepted form.
  • D. isLessStandardizedThan
    Indicates that one entity follows fewer or less rigid standards, norms, or formalized procedures than another entity.
  • E. notEncodedIn
    Indicates that a piece of information, data, or content is explicitly absent from or not represented within a given encoding, format, or medium.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348c84c1c81908739f100ecf7394e completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a5f71b2c8190aade8a83f465be0c completed May 3, 2026, 1:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69fe66df08190958558d63ee623d9 completed May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6a5f656ec81909e02b0b873303adf completed May 3, 2026, 1:33 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:22 p.m.