Triple

T31428434
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roman military institutions E801729 entity
Predicate usesMilitaryUnit P181263 FINISHED
Object Roman legion NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roman legion | Statement: [Roman military institutions, usesMilitaryUnit, Roman legion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesMilitaryUnit
Context triple: [Roman military institutions, usesMilitaryUnit, Roman legion]
  • A. isAboutMilitaryUnit
    Indicates that something (such as a document, statement, or resource) concerns, discusses, or pertains to a specific military unit.
  • B. hasMilitaryType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a specific military category, role, or type.
  • C. usesMilitarySystemSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity employs a military system that is comparable in structure, doctrine, or operational methods to that of another entity.
  • D. isMilitaryCommand
    Indicates that one entity holds formal military authority or command over another entity or group.
  • E. militaryUnitOf
    Indicates that one entity is a military unit that belongs to, is part of, or is under the command or organizational structure of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348c475348190bf579ca858eec77c completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7675b12848190a3569cfda29c5b0e completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f762f4b59481909f70074f11825bfb completed May 3, 2026, 3 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f76759b3c48190ad8f1b33596f98c4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 8:55 p.m.