Triple
T31414067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intellectual Property Enterprise Court |
E801343
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMonetaryValueLimit |
P125398
|
FINISHED |
| Object | £500,000 for most claims |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: £500,000 for most claims | Statement: [Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, hasMonetaryValueLimit, £500,000 for most claims]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMonetaryValueLimit Context triple: [Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, hasMonetaryValueLimit, £500,000 for most claims]
-
A.
monetaryLimit
chosen
Indicates a constraint or maximum allowable amount of money associated with an action, transaction, or relationship.
-
B.
hasMaximumBalanceLimit
Indicates that there is an upper bound on the balance that an account or entity is allowed to hold.
-
C.
hasMonetaryComponent
Indicates that something includes, involves, or is associated with a monetary or financial element.
-
D.
guaranteeLimitBasis
Indicates the basis or criteria used to determine the limit of a guarantee in a contractual or financial context.
-
E.
loanLimitType
Indicates the category or rule that defines how a loan’s maximum allowable amount or terms are limited.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348c0dd648190bf2fd7642f78eb06 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdbc5ef46c8190bbcfb9798f4615b7 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdbb270338819082ce3f73903e884f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 8:41 p.m.