Triple
T31381844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Clastidium |
E800480
|
entity |
| Predicate | GallicCommander |
P171674
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Viridomarus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Viridomarus | Statement: [Battle of Clastidium, GallicCommander, Viridomarus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: GallicCommander Context triple: [Battle of Clastidium, GallicCommander, Viridomarus]
-
A.
roleInGallicWars
Indicates the role or involvement an entity had in the events or campaigns of the Gallic Wars.
-
B.
NumidianCommander
Indicates that an entity serves as a military commander associated with Numidia or Numidian forces.
-
C.
RomanCommander
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds the role or position of a commander within a Roman military or organizational context.
-
D.
commanderOfFrankishForces
Indicates that one entity serves as the commander of the Frankish military forces in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
commanderOfVisigothicForces
Indicates that one entity serves as the military commander of the Visigothic forces in a given context or conflict.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e84da08190abfc2f17494a33c8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a1ac56b88190a820434b65c9fa23 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69fe463248190aa78128abeab1183 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6a0e920cc8190a943fdd0594906c5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:19 p.m.