Triple
T31373720
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jeremy Heere |
E800234
|
entity |
| Predicate | SQUIPFullForm |
P2351
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Super Quantum Unit Intel Processor |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Super Quantum Unit Intel Processor | Statement: [Jeremy Heere, SQUIPFullForm, Super Quantum Unit Intel Processor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SQUIPFullForm Context triple: [Jeremy Heere, SQUIPFullForm, Super Quantum Unit Intel Processor]
-
A.
fullyFormulatedIn
Indicates that something is completely and explicitly expressed, defined, or developed within a specified context or medium.
-
B.
hasFullForm
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the complete, expanded, or unabbreviated form of another entity.
-
C.
isFormulatedUsing
Indicates that something is created, defined, or expressed by means of a specified method, material, or set of components.
-
D.
formulatedInTermsOf
Indicates that one concept, statement, or representation is expressed, defined, or described using the language, framework, or components of another.
-
E.
expandedForm
Indicates that one representation is the expanded or fully written-out form of another, typically decomposing it into a sum or more detailed expression.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e84da08190abfc2f17494a33c8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69feac6c481908774e3f3104c0cf3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69d1d25e88190a7f57d323574da90 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:18 p.m.