Triple
T31363330
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Konopiště Castle |
E799937
|
entity |
| Predicate | styleOfReconstruction |
P172861
|
FINISHED |
| Object | romantic historicism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic historicism | Statement: [Konopiště Castle, styleOfReconstruction, romantic historicism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleOfReconstruction Context triple: [Konopiště Castle, styleOfReconstruction, romantic historicism]
-
A.
rebuiltInArchitecturalStyleBy
Indicates that something was reconstructed or renovated according to a particular architectural style by a specified agent (such as an architect, firm, or organization).
-
B.
reconstructionMethod
Indicates the technique or process used to reconstruct, restore, or rebuild something from its original or fragmented state.
-
C.
reconstructionUsedIn
Indicates that a particular reconstruction (e.g., a restored version or inferred structure) is employed or applied within a given context, process, or work.
-
D.
reconstructionFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a reconstruction, restoration, or rebuilt version of another entity.
-
E.
historicalReconstruction
Indicates the process of recreating or inferring past events, conditions, or states of affairs based on available evidence or records.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e6b7448190ac6bf97ad7364160 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b0d21dd08190a9883ff71c94c71c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca3dedc81908b519d53d2909868 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6afeaaef88190aefa97e83f8db906 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:18 p.m.