Triple

T31356921
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CAC Mustang E799760 entity
Predicate successorInRAAFService P198599 FINISHED
Object CAC Sabre NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CAC Sabre | Statement: [CAC Mustang, successorInRAAFService, CAC Sabre]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorInRAAFService
Context triple: [CAC Mustang, successorInRAAFService, CAC Sabre]
  • A. successorInU.S.Service
    Indicates that one entity directly follows another in holding a particular position or role within U.S. service.
  • B. successorInRNZAFRole
    Indicates that one entity took over and continued the same role or position in the RNZAF that was previously held by another entity.
  • C. successorInUSNTrainingRole
    Indicates that one entity has taken over or followed another in a specific training role within the United States Navy.
  • D. enteredUSAFServiceAs
    Indicates that an individual began active service in the United States Air Force in a specified role, rank, or capacity.
  • E. successorInRAFService
    Indicates that one entity took over or continued the role, position, or service of another within the Royal Air Force (RAF).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e5e9bc8190a16339328897c4f8 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fef5cf8da881908260ec633830375d completed May 9, 2026, 8:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fef455e40481909861c82007b79bc0 completed May 9, 2026, 8:46 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fef5cec8208190b85665ab6a511a08 completed May 9, 2026, 8:52 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:17 p.m.