Triple
T31347870
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Party Planning Committee |
E799498
|
entity |
| Predicate | toneInSeries |
P171265
|
FINISHED |
| Object | source of comedic conflict |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: source of comedic conflict | Statement: [Party Planning Committee, toneInSeries, source of comedic conflict]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: toneInSeries Context triple: [Party Planning Committee, toneInSeries, source of comedic conflict]
-
A.
tone
Indicates the characteristic attitude or emotional quality expressed in how something is communicated or presented.
-
B.
tonePattern
Indicates the characteristic arrangement or sequence of tones associated with an entity, such as in speech, music, or signaling.
-
C.
tonal
Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
-
D.
inTonality
Indicates that something (such as a musical element, passage, or piece) is expressed, structured, or interpreted within a specific musical key or tonal framework.
-
E.
toneCount
Indicates the number of distinct tones or tonal elements associated with an entity or expression.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e51614819083141459a080e97c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69f19a79c81909647d8eef6706e44 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69d1d25e88190a7f57d323574da90 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f69ea761848190acb31298e65b7892 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:17 p.m.