Triple

T313471
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Additional Protocol I E7654 entity
Predicate establishesPrinciple P11867 FINISHED
Object principle of distinction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: principle of distinction | Statement: [Additional Protocol I, establishesPrinciple, principle of distinction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishesPrinciple
Context triple: [Additional Protocol I, establishesPrinciple, principle of distinction]
  • A. usesPrinciple
    Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
  • B. supportsPrinciple
    Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or actively backs a particular principle or doctrine.
  • C. typeOfPrinciples
    Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies the kind or category of principles that another entity embodies, uses, or is governed by.
  • D. constitutionalPrinciple
    Indicates that something embodies, expresses, or is governed by a fundamental rule or doctrine within a constitutional system.
  • E. violatedPrinciple
    Indicates that an entity has broken, disregarded, or acted contrary to a specified rule, norm, or guiding principle.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e7af7881908890039d6be4e9b8 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea4bd6a081909bdb57602c7093b4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e9428098819089d5950cd2c96dc4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea08878c8190a5e8a90f620a3888 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 p.m.