Triple
T31342009
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | J. W. Milam |
E799329
|
entity |
| Predicate | confessionPublishedIn |
P309
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Look magazine |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Look magazine | Statement: [J. W. Milam, confessionPublishedIn, Look magazine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confessionPublishedIn Context triple: [J. W. Milam, confessionPublishedIn, Look magazine]
-
A.
confessionAuthored
Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of a particular confession made or recorded by another entity.
-
B.
madePublicConfessionAt
Indicates that an entity openly admitted or confessed something in a public setting at a specific time or place.
-
C.
confessionObtainedBy
Indicates that a confession was acquired through a particular method, action, or process.
-
D.
publishedIn
chosen
Indicates that a work (such as an article, paper, or book) has been formally released or made available within a specific venue, medium, or publication.
-
E.
confessionStatus
Indicates whether an entity has admitted or denied involvement, responsibility, or guilt in relation to a particular event, action, or accusation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e51614819083141459a080e97c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7805ce6208190ac6dbd9c97989978 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f77956ec648190ba4fb7e9d83fd107 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:17 p.m.