Triple

T31326319
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Western Islamic lands E798895 entity
Predicate includedLanguage P2177 FINISHED
Object Berber languages NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Berber languages | Statement: [Western Islamic lands, includedLanguage, Berber languages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includedLanguage
Context triple: [Western Islamic lands, includedLanguage, Berber languages]
  • A. includesLanguage chosen
    Indicates that one entity contains, supports, or makes use of a specified language as part of its content, functionality, or representation.
  • B. eligibleLanguage
    Indicates that a particular language satisfies the required conditions to be considered valid or allowed in a given context.
  • C. requiredLanguage
    Indicates that a specific language is necessary or must be used for a given entity, action, or interaction.
  • D. includesLanguageCluster
    Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses a specific group or cluster of related languages as part of its composition or scope.
  • E. usesLanguageFor
    Indicates that an entity employs a particular language as a tool or medium to perform some activity, function, or purpose.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e3238c8190b2291f50ea4962cd completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a011e5a419081908d06a07b395ebd97 completed May 11, 2026, 12:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a011de119048190b27d361cffabc228 completed May 11, 2026, 12:08 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:15 p.m.