Triple

T31325221
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Persian conquest of Phocaea E798863 entity
Predicate conqueror P164235 FINISHED
Object Achaemenid Persian Empire NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Achaemenid Persian Empire | Statement: [Persian conquest of Phocaea, conqueror, Achaemenid Persian Empire]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conqueror
Context triple: [Persian conquest of Phocaea, conqueror, Achaemenid Persian Empire]
  • A. conqueredByRuler
    Indicates that a place, people, or entity was taken over and brought under control through force or domination by a specific ruler.
  • B. encounteredConqueror
    Indicates that one entity has come into contact with or faced a conquering entity, typically in a context of conflict, dominance, or subjugation.
  • C. realmConqueredBy chosen
    Indicates that a particular realm or territory has been taken over and brought under the control of a specified conqueror.
  • D. besieger
    Indicates that one entity is laying siege to, or conducting a siege against, another entity.
  • E. conqueredFrom
    Indicates that one entity gained control of another entity by taking it from a third party that previously held it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e3238c8190b2291f50ea4962cd completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69eb008808190bdf42de72d202baf completed May 3, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69d1d25e88190a7f57d323574da90 completed May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:15 p.m.