Triple

T31307695
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Davis–Besse Nuclear Power Station E798377 entity
Predicate hasSafetyIssue P103393 FINISHED
Object reactor vessel head corrosion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reactor vessel head corrosion | Statement: [Davis–Besse Nuclear Power Station, hasSafetyIssue, reactor vessel head corrosion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSafetyIssue
Context triple: [Davis–Besse Nuclear Power Station, hasSafetyIssue, reactor vessel head corrosion]
  • A. safetyIssueHighlighted chosen
    Indicates that a particular safety concern or hazard has been identified and explicitly brought to attention.
  • B. hasIssueWith
    Indicates that one entity experiences a problem, conflict, or concern related to another entity.
  • C. hasSafetyCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific safety-related property, feature, or attribute.
  • D. hasCertificationIssueIn
    Indicates that an entity has a certification-related problem, defect, or noncompliance occurring within a specified context, scope, or location.
  • E. hasSecurityConsideration
    Indicates that there is a relevant security-related issue, risk, or precaution associated with the referenced entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e0bd4c8190aab9b29a73f7aa3c completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f74c70fd248190a9d5543afcb08211 completed May 3, 2026, 1:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7478e3b548190a51d5d436e2bb036 completed May 3, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.