Triple
T31303548
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1981 Brixton riot |
E798271
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableLawInvolved |
—
|
GENERATED |
| Object | sus law |
—
|
UNRECOGNIZED GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableLawInvolved Context triple: [1981 Brixton riot, notableLawInvolved, sus law]
-
A.
notableLegalCode
Indicates that a legal code is especially significant, influential, or noteworthy in relation to the referenced entity.
-
B.
notableAreaOfLaw
Indicates that a person or entity is particularly recognized or distinguished in a specific field or area of law.
-
C.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
D.
statuteInvolved
chosen
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
-
E.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e0bd4c8190aab9b29a73f7aa3c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.