Triple

T31299623
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blue Limousine E798177 entity
Predicate basedOnRhythmicStyle P7864 FINISHED
Object funk groove LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: funk groove | Statement: [Blue Limousine, basedOnRhythmicStyle, funk groove]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: basedOnRhythmicStyle
Context triple: [Blue Limousine, basedOnRhythmicStyle, funk groove]
  • A. hasRhythmicStyle chosen
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
  • B. hasRhythmInfluence
    Indicates that one entity has influenced or shaped the rhythmic patterns, style, or timing characteristics of another entity.
  • C. rhythmicOrganization
    Indicates how temporal patterns, accents, and durations are structured or arranged in relation to one another within a sequence or system.
  • D. hasRhythmicOrigin
    Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on rhythm or rhythmic patterns.
  • E. hasRhythmicComplexity
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or involves a level of rhythmic intricacy or variation in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e0bd4c8190aab9b29a73f7aa3c completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fde49a084081909d99b1e0258169d5 completed May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fde1d04bd881909a46ecbbf18dfe59 completed May 8, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.