Triple
T31298335
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prince symbol |
E798140
|
entity |
| Predicate | imageAvailable |
P171545
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Prince symbol, imageAvailable, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: imageAvailable Context triple: [Prince symbol, imageAvailable, yes]
-
A.
hasImageFeature
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific visual characteristic or attribute extracted from an image.
-
B.
containsImage
Indicates that one entity includes or embeds an image as part of its content or structure.
-
C.
imagedIn
Indicates that one entity appears within or is depicted in an image associated with another entity.
-
D.
hasImageRole
Indicates that an image is associated with an entity in a specific functional or contextual role (e.g., thumbnail, icon, illustration).
-
E.
isImageOf
Indicates that one entity is a visual depiction or representation of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e0bd4c8190aab9b29a73f7aa3c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69f80b62c8190bf2af2be0d3a7df8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69d1bf8cc8190a78dfa5ab00daf3a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f69edae2448190925ce701c8792c52 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.