Triple

T3129044
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 33 “GOD” E65365 entity
Predicate hasReligiousReferences P24743 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [33 “GOD”, hasReligiousReferences, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReligiousReferences
Context triple: [33 “GOD”, hasReligiousReferences, yes]
  • A. hasReligiousTheme chosen
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or object) centrally involves or expresses religious ideas, symbols, practices, or narratives.
  • B. hasAssociatedReligion
    Indicates that an entity is connected with or linked to a particular religion.
  • C. usedInReligiousTextsOf
    Indicates that something (such as a concept, term, or symbol) appears within and is employed in the religious texts associated with a particular religion or tradition.
  • D. hasReligiousCharacter
    Indicates that an entity possesses a religious nature, function, or affiliation, or is characterized by religious aspects or significance.
  • E. hasReligiousOrigin
    Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on a religious tradition, belief system, or practice.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8580c72481909672d37acf647893 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada548123c8190bcfe780c65941585 completed March 8, 2026, 4:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9df62e548190b053e1478deed467 completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m.