Triple
T3126026
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crack Music |
E65297
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCallAndResponseElements |
P22739
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Crack Music, hasCallAndResponseElements, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCallAndResponseElements Context triple: [Crack Music, hasCallAndResponseElements, true]
-
A.
hasCallAndResponseStructure
chosen
Indicates that one element initiates a call and another element provides a corresponding response, forming a paired, back-and-forth structural pattern.
-
B.
hasCallingConvention
Indicates that a function or method uses a specific calling convention that defines how arguments are passed and results are returned.
-
C.
hasProgramElement
Indicates that one entity contains, includes, or is associated with a specific program element (such as a function, class, module, or code component).
-
D.
hasProtocol
Indicates that an entity uses, follows, or is governed by a specified protocol or set of procedural rules.
-
E.
respondsTo
Indicates that one entity replies or reacts to a message, action, or stimulus originating from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8580c72481909672d37acf647893 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada52e9f348190aa15b2c0d252719f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9df62e548190b053e1478deed467 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m.