Triple

T31258038
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eóganachta dynasty E797033 entity
Predicate usedSuccessionSystem P171639 FINISHED
Object tanistry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tanistry | Statement: [Eóganachta dynasty, usedSuccessionSystem, tanistry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedSuccessionSystem
Context triple: [Eóganachta dynasty, usedSuccessionSystem, tanistry]
  • A. governedSuccessionOf
    Indicates a succession relationship in which one entity follows another under an established governing rule, law, or authority.
  • B. successionRitual
    Indicates a ritual or ceremonial process through which authority, leadership, or status is formally transferred from one entity to another.
  • C. successionOrder
    Indicates the ordered sequence in which entities are designated to succeed or take over a role, position, or title.
  • D. supportedSuccessionOf
    Indicates that one entity actively endorsed or helped bring about the transfer of power, position, or role from a predecessor to a successor.
  • E. involvesSuccession
    Indicates that one entity follows or replaces another in a sequence, role, or state as part of a succession relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224dd5fdc81908a4cd24917b67668 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a1ac56b88190a820434b65c9fa23 completed May 3, 2026, 1:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69fe463248190aa78128abeab1183 completed May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6a0e920cc8190a943fdd0594906c5 completed May 3, 2026, 1:12 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:12 p.m.