Triple

T31251821
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A Woman E796842 entity
Predicate hasRelationshipToDirector P118003 FINISHED
Object starredInByDirector LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: starredInByDirector | Statement: [A Woman, hasRelationshipToDirector, starredInByDirector]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipToDirector
Context triple: [A Woman, hasRelationshipToDirector, starredInByDirector]
  • A. belongsToDirectorFilmographyOf
    Indicates that a film is part of the collection of works directed by a particular director (i.e., included in that director’s filmography).
  • B. hasDirectorInKeyWork
    Indicates that a director is associated with a key or primary work of an entity (such as a film, series, or major production).
  • C. hasDirectorStar
    Indicates that a person both directed and starred in the same work (e.g., film, show, or production).
  • D. associatedWithDirectors chosen
    Indicates a direct relationship or connection between an entity and one or more film or project directors.
  • E. hasAssociatedFranchiseViaDirector
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a franchise through the involvement of a director who connects the entity to that franchise.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224dc84d0819081f1cb6f9127e6b1 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a01203ac018819085d7c9abd8345b23 completed May 11, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a011f3f149c819090749722da0e3413 completed May 11, 2026, 12:13 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:11 p.m.