Triple
T31235520
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | He Was Beautiful |
E796409
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalInstrumentalComposer |
P86742
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stanley Myers |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stanley Myers | Statement: [He Was Beautiful, originalInstrumentalComposer, Stanley Myers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalInstrumentalComposer Context triple: [He Was Beautiful, originalInstrumentalComposer, Stanley Myers]
-
A.
recordedComposer
Indicates that one entity has made an audio or video recording of a musical work composed by another entity.
-
B.
originallyInstrumental
Indicates that an entity was initially used as the instrument or means by which an action or effect was brought about, especially when this instrumental role may have changed over time.
-
C.
instrumentalBy
Indicates that an action or outcome is achieved, carried out, or mediated through the use of a particular instrument, means, or tool.
-
D.
hasUnknownOriginalComposer
Indicates that the work’s original composer is not known or cannot be identified.
-
E.
composedForMusicBy
chosen
Indicates that a musical work was specifically created or written by a particular composer.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224db69ac81909a370adad6a7ac7c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a009a0e1fa481909ed881012009b268 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0092e9fcb08190a966d720684f25ec |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:11 p.m.