Triple
T31224076
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cavour-class aircraft carrier |
E796089
|
entity |
| Predicate | modernizationForAircraftType |
P185961
|
FINISHED |
| Object | F-35B Lightning II |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: F-35B Lightning II | Statement: [Cavour-class aircraft carrier, modernizationForAircraftType, F-35B Lightning II]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modernizationForAircraftType Context triple: [Cavour-class aircraft carrier, modernizationForAircraftType, F-35B Lightning II]
-
A.
aircraftModification
Indicates a relationship where an aircraft undergoes a change, upgrade, or alteration to its structure, systems, or configuration.
-
B.
modernizationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of modernization applied to an entity or system.
-
C.
isModernizationOf
Indicates that one entity is an updated, improved, or contemporary version of another earlier entity.
-
D.
aircraftTypeManaged
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing or overseeing a particular type or category of aircraft.
-
E.
eraOfDesignatedAircraft
Indicates the historical time period or era during which the designated aircraft was primarily designed, developed, or in standard operational use.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224da98f88190ab32f690cce5d303 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c83f5960819089610ed39c839678 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c475c58c8190a883554231e88c88 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7c776b4088190bef550c869da530d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:10 p.m.