Triple

T31222389
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sam (Trick 'r Treat) E796046 entity
Predicate appearsThroughout P795 FINISHED
Object interconnected anthology stories LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interconnected anthology stories | Statement: [Sam (Trick 'r Treat), appearsThroughout, interconnected anthology stories]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appearsThroughout
Context triple: [Sam (Trick 'r Treat), appearsThroughout, interconnected anthology stories]
  • A. appearsFor
    Indicates that one entity is presented, shown, or made visible on behalf of, or in representation of, another entity.
  • B. appearsIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity is present, featured, or occurs within a particular context, work, or medium.
  • C. appearedAt
    Indicates that an entity was present or made an appearance at a specific event, location, or occasion.
  • D. appearsInContinuity
    Indicates that an entity is part of, or occurs within, a specific narrative continuity or canon timeline.
  • E. reappearsIn
    Indicates that an entity that previously appeared becomes present or visible again in the same or another context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224da98f88190ab32f690cce5d303 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fccdd496048190bca801a8a9eecb62 completed May 7, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcccee6240819084680887731ff64b completed May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:10 p.m.