Triple
T31210148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Waterford County Council |
E795714
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentAuthority |
P171032
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Waterford City and County Council |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Waterford City and County Council | Statement: [Waterford County Council, subsequentAuthority, Waterford City and County Council]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentAuthority Context triple: [Waterford County Council, subsequentAuthority, Waterford City and County Council]
-
A.
subsequentAuthorityType
Indicates the type or category of authority that follows or succeeds a prior authority in a sequence or hierarchy.
-
B.
secondaryAuthority
Indicates that an entity holds a subordinate or supporting level of authority relative to a primary authority within a given context.
-
C.
succeededByAuthorityType
Indicates that one authority type is directly followed or replaced by another authority type in a sequence or hierarchy.
-
D.
subsequentProsecutor
Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
-
E.
subsequentDesignation
Indicates that one designation or status follows and replaces another in a sequence or timeline.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d9d52c8190a61f68ded37fa755 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69c26b2a0819099c6abe4a0b2280c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f696673214819094350e1d2648ef34 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:27 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6978ec27c8190a488e1f9c2566d38 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:09 p.m.