Triple
T3120143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Annotationes maiores in Novum Testamentum |
E65163
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfCommentary |
P45476
|
FINISHED |
| Object | verse-by-verse commentary |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: verse-by-verse commentary | Statement: [Annotationes maiores in Novum Testamentum, typeOfCommentary, verse-by-verse commentary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfCommentary Context triple: [Annotationes maiores in Novum Testamentum, typeOfCommentary, verse-by-verse commentary]
-
A.
hasCommentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides commentary, explanation, or evaluative remarks about another entity.
-
B.
commentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides evaluative or explanatory remarks about another entity, such as a work, event, or statement.
-
C.
commentator
Indicates that an entity provides spoken or written real-time explanation, analysis, or opinion about an event, action, or content involving another entity.
-
D.
spectatorType
Indicates the role or category of a spectator in relation to an event or activity.
-
E.
commentaryPartner
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a partner or co-participant with another in providing commentary or discussion.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857fcc088190b0c4d45a5cde6f61 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada4eb6a6081909df41f67999eb4ff |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9df455088190940ad04419772dc8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada0f7c21c819087e9992f5fe30a37 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m.