Triple

T31200917
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fremen Reverend Mother E795471 entity
Predicate gainsAbility P171022 FINISHED
Object access to ancestral memories LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: access to ancestral memories | Statement: [Fremen Reverend Mother, gainsAbility, access to ancestral memories]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: gainsAbility
Context triple: [Fremen Reverend Mother, gainsAbility, access to ancestral memories]
  • A. gainedPowerAfter
    Indicates that one entity acquired power, authority, or influence subsequent to an event, condition, or action involving another entity.
  • B. believedToHaveAbility
    Indicates that one entity is thought or assumed to possess a particular capability or power, without asserting that the ability is actually verified.
  • C. claimedAbility
    Indicates that an entity asserts or reports having a particular ability, regardless of whether that ability is actually possessed or demonstrated.
  • D. forceAbility
    Indicates that one entity has the power or capacity to compel, influence, or cause another entity to act or change in a particular way.
  • E. grantsAbility
    Indicates that one entity endows another entity with a specific capability or power that it did not previously possess.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224d8c6608190b7882466521f62be completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69bc2ca808190876e5cb05012dbfc completed May 3, 2026, 12:50 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f696673214819094350e1d2648ef34 completed May 3, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6978ec27c8190a488e1f9c2566d38 completed May 3, 2026, 12:32 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:09 p.m.