Triple
T31189346
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adir Hu |
E795138
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesAddressTo |
P179057
|
FINISHED |
| Object | God |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: God | Statement: [Adir Hu, usesAddressTo, God]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesAddressTo Context triple: [Adir Hu, usesAddressTo, God]
-
A.
hasAddress
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific address or location.
-
B.
usesAddressingSystem
Indicates that one entity employs or applies a particular addressing system associated with another entity.
-
C.
canAddress
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to direct communication, action, or service toward another entity.
-
D.
usesMailingAddressOf
Indicates that one entity uses another entity’s mailing address as its own for receiving mail or official correspondence.
-
E.
addressedWith
Indicates that one entity is referred to or spoken to using a particular name, title, or form of address.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d7a6a481908187c4362a8a525f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f719cc31ec819099bebcf833b14d76 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71820c6c88190ab38b4fa626d22cc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f71995853c8190912025c0e83640c8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:08 p.m.