Triple

T31184931
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Anthology 1 E795012 entity
Predicate includesAlternateTakes P103940 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Anthology 1, includesAlternateTakes, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesAlternateTakes
Context triple: [Anthology 1, includesAlternateTakes, true]
  • A. hasAlternateTake chosen
    Indicates that one entity is an alternative version or different take of another, typically representing a variant recording, shot, or rendition of the same underlying content.
  • B. hasAlternativeArrangement
    Indicates that one entity can be organized, configured, or structured in a different valid way as an alternative to its current or primary arrangement.
  • C. hasAlternativeArrangementsFor
    Indicates that one entity provides or specifies substitute or backup arrangements that can be used in place of another entity’s primary arrangements.
  • D. hasAlternateCut
    Indicates that an entity has an alternative edited version or cut, distinct from its primary or original form.
  • E. numberOfTakesUsed
    Indicates the specific count of takes that were actually used in the final version of a recording or production.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224d675d08190957198068e440422 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a00d15f7b788190a3bf440be7837192 completed May 10, 2026, 6:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a00d0f8ef548190b1c15b06164eec4a completed May 10, 2026, 6:39 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:08 p.m.