Triple
T31169308
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Morning Bell/Amnesiac |
E794559
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubduedArrangement |
P197518
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Morning Bell/Amnesiac, hasSubduedArrangement, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubduedArrangement Context triple: [Morning Bell/Amnesiac, hasSubduedArrangement, true]
-
A.
hasArrangement
Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
-
B.
canBeSubduedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of overpowering, restraining, or otherwise bringing another entity under control.
-
C.
hasArrangementFor
Indicates that one entity has an established plan, setup, or provision in place to accommodate, support, or serve another entity or purpose.
-
D.
hasArrangementBy
Indicates that something (such as a work or piece) is in an arranged form created by a particular arranger.
-
E.
hasNotableArrangementFor
Indicates that one entity is distinguished by a significant or noteworthy arrangement, configuration, or setup specifically made for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d5b9708190b6ca79ad2fd3a28a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe991bca608190b524e419642f4243 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe979fc1c4819091fc48d63ea12063 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe991abc6c81908edbb98d61c9ca73 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:07 p.m.