Triple

T3116684
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lao script E65078 entity
Predicate toneMarkFunction P45436 FINISHED
Object indicates lexical tone in Lao LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: indicates lexical tone in Lao | Statement: [Lao script, toneMarkFunction, indicates lexical tone in Lao]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: toneMarkFunction
Context triple: [Lao script, toneMarkFunction, indicates lexical tone in Lao]
  • A. hasPhonemicTone
    Indicates that a language, word, or syllable uses pitch differences (tones) as phonemic contrasts that can change meaning.
  • B. marksStylisticShiftFrom
    Indicates that one element signals a change in style, tone, or manner relative to another element.
  • C. hasCaseMarking
    Indicates that a linguistic element (such as a noun or pronoun) bears a specific grammatical case marking that signals its syntactic or semantic role in a clause.
  • D. marksShiftToward
    Indicates a change or transition from one state, condition, or position toward another, highlighting the direction or trend of that shift.
  • E. marksOn
    Indicates that one entity bears visible signs, traces, or imprints that have been made or left by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad857fcc088190b0c4d45a5cde6f61 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada4e5d1488190a2ab199625fdf05d completed March 8, 2026, 4:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9df455088190940ad04419772dc8 completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada0f7c21c819087e9992f5fe30a37 completed March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m.