Triple
T3116479
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bolívar Province |
E65073
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMunicipalSubdivisionType |
P10835
|
FINISHED |
| Object | canton |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canton | Statement: [Bolívar Province, hasMunicipalSubdivisionType, canton]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMunicipalSubdivisionType Context triple: [Bolívar Province, hasMunicipalSubdivisionType, canton]
-
A.
hasTypeOfSubdivision
Indicates that one administrative or territorial unit is classified as a specific kind or category of subdivision.
-
B.
hasMunicipalityType
chosen
Indicates that an administrative unit is classified as having a specific type or category of municipality (e.g., city, town, village).
-
C.
hasSubdivision
Indicates that one entity is divided into and contains another entity as one of its constituent parts or administrative units.
-
D.
hasSubdivisionCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific code identifying one of its internal subdivisions (such as a state, province, or region).
-
E.
isInCountySubdivision
Indicates that one entity (typically a place or address) is located within the boundaries of a specific county subdivision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857fcc088190b0c4d45a5cde6f61 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada4e5d1488190a2ab199625fdf05d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9df455088190940ad04419772dc8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m.